تبیین مؤلفه‌های کلیدی خط‌مشی صنعتی موفق

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.

3 استاد، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران.

10.22103/jogapp.2025.26396.1003

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: خط‌مشی صنعتی به عنوان مداخله هدفمند و قاعده‌مند دولت برای شکل‌دهی به ساختار بخشی اقتصاد به سمت فعالیت‌های با ارزش افزوده بالاتر و غلبه بر شکست‌های بازار تعریف می‌شود. در شرایط افول اجماع واشنگتن و احیای مجدد خط مشی‌های صنعتی در اقتصادهای نوظهور، این پرسش اساسی مطرح می‌گردد که مبانی نظری و مؤلفه‌های کلیدی یک خط‌مشی صنعتی موفق کدام‌اند؟ پژوهش حاضر با هدف تبیین مبانی نظری و شناسایی مؤلفه‌های کلیدی خط‌مشی صنعتی موفق انجام شده است
روش‌شناسی پژوهش: این پژوهش با رویکردی توصیفی-تحلیلی و از طریق مطالعه اسنادی و تحلیل مقالات علمی-پژوهشی داخلی و خارجی مرتبط با خط‌مشی صنعتی انجام شده است.
یافته ها: تحلیل یافته ها نشان می دهد که خط‌مشی صنعتی موفق بر هشت مؤلفه کلیدی همترازی، تحول ساختاری، اقتصاد سیاسی سازنده، مزیت نسبی، صنعت نوزاد، اثرات پیوندی، یادگیری فناورانه و تأمین مالی بلندمدت استوار است.
نتیجه‌گیری: موفقیت خط‌مشی صنعتی در گرو نگرش سیستمی و توجه همزمان به تمامی مؤلفه‌های شناسایی‌شده است. این مؤلفه‌ها در تعامل پویا با یکدیگر قرار داشته و اجرای مؤثر آن‌ها مستلزم ظرفیت نهادی، رویکرد عمل‌گرا و تعامل سازنده بین دولت، بخش خصوصی و دانشگاه است. در نهایت، خط مشی صنعتی باید انعطاف‌پذیر بوده و با شرایط خاص هر کشور همسو شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind. The Journal of Economic History, 46(2), 385 – 406. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700046209
Aiginger, K. (2007).  Industrial Policy: A Dying Breed or A Re-emerging Phoenix?  Journal of Industry Competition and Trade, 7 (3), pp. 297–323.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-007-0025-7
Aiginger, K. and Sieber, S. (2006). The Matrix Approach to Industrial Policy.  International Review of Applied Economics.  20 (5). Pp. 573-601.
Babb, S. (2013). The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: its origins, trajectory and likely successor.  Review of International Political Economy, 20(2): 268-297. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:107499
Ban, C. (2013). Brazil's liberal neo-developmentalism: new paradigm or edited orthodoxy?.  Review of International Political Economy, 20(2): 298-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.660183
Ban, C. and Blyth, M. (2013). The BRICs and the Washington consensus: an introduction.  Review of International Political Economy, 20(2): 241-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2013.779374
Baptista, R. and Swann, P. (1998). Do firms in clusters innovate more?. Research Policy,  27(5). Pp. 525-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00065-1
Chang, H.J. (1994). The Political Economy of Industrial Policy. Macmillan Press.
Chang, H.J. (2006). Industrial policy in East Asia: Lessons for Europe.  European Investment Bank (EIB), 11(2).  Pp. 106-132. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/44860
Chang, H.J. (2011). Industrial Policy: Can We Go Beyond an Unproductive Confrontation? The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. 83-109. https://www.rrojasdatabank.info/wbdevecon10-9.pdf
Chang, H.-J. and Andreoni, A. (2016). Industrial policy in a changing world: basic principles, neglected issues and new challenges.  paper presented at the Cambridge Journal of Economics 40 Years Conference, St Catharine's College, Cambridge, 12-13 July. Pp. 1-52. https://cpes.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Chang_Andreoni_2016_Industrial-Policy.pdf
Coutinho, L., Ferraz, J.C., Nassif, A. and Oliva, R. (2012). 'Industrial policy and economic transformation', in Santiso, J. and Dayton-Johnson, J. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Latin American Political Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 100-132. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199747504.001.0001
Devlin, R. & Moguillansky, G. (2011). Publication: Breeding Latin American Tigers: Operational Principles for Rehabilitating Industrial Policies. ECLAC & The World Bank, 65655. PP. 1-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-86880
Ellison, G., Glaeser, E.L. and Kerr, W.R. (2010). What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns. American Economic Review, 100 (3). Pp. 1195-1213.                                               DOI: 10.1257/aer.100.3.1195
Gallagher, K.P. (2016). The China triangle: Latin America's China boom and the fate of the Washington Consensus.  New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 1-256.
Gore, C. (2000). The rise and fall of the Washington Consensus as a paradigm for developing countries. World development, 28(5): 789-804.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00160-6
Greenwald, b. c.,  and Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). Industrial Policies, the Creation of a Learning Society, and Economic Development. In The industrial policy revolution I, Stiglitz, J. E. & Lin J. Y. , London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp.43-71. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137335173_4
Hall, P. (1986). Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. Oxford University Press. Pp. 1-341.
Hatta, T.(2017). Competition Policy vs. Industrial Policy as a Growth Strategy. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, ERIA-DP-2016-40. Pp. 1-23.  https://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2016-40.pdf
Hirschman, A. (2013). Social Conflicts as Pillars of Democratic Market Society. The Essential Hirschman, 345-362.    https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691159904.003.0016
Jiang, X. (1996). The industrial policy of the period of economic transition. Publisher: Life. Reading Joint Publishing.        https://www.amazon.com/-/es/JIANG-XIAO-JUAN/dp/7208021937
Johnson, Ch. (1982). MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy 1925– 1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Pp. 1-412.  https://www.sup.org/books/politics/miti-and-japanese-miracle
Khan, M. (2015).  Supporting Inclusive Growth Effective Policy Design for Developing Medium Technology Sectors Application to Vietnam. UNDP Policy Advisory Team,  UNDP Viet Nam. Pp. 1-52. https://www.undp.org/vietnam/publications/supporting-inclusive-growth-effective-policy-design
Khan, M. H. (2013a). The Political Settlement, Growth and Technical Progress in Bangladesh.  Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Copenhagen, No. 2013:01. Pp. 1-160. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/122274
Khan, M. H., & Blankenburg, S. (2009). The Political  Economy of Industrial Policy in Asia and Latin America. In G. Dosi, M. Cimoli, & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), Industrial Policy and Development: The Political Economy of Capabilities Accumulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 336-377. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780199235261.003.0013
Khan, M.H. (2007). Governance, Economic Growth and Development Since the 1960s. UN/DESA Working Papers, (54). Pp. 1-23. http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers
Lauridsen, L.S. (2010). Strategic industrial policy and latecomer development: the what, the why and the how. Forum for Development Studies, 37(1): 7-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410903558244
Lauridsen, L.S. (2010). Strategic industrial policy and latecomer development: the what, the why and the how. Forum for Development Studies, 37(1): 7-32.   https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410903558244
Lazzarini, S. G., Jank, M. S., & Inoue, C. F. K. (2015). Commodities no Brasil: maldição ou benção. In O futuro da indústria no Brasil: desindustrialização em debate (pp. 201-225). Civilização Brasileira.
Lee, K. & Malerba, F. (2018). Economic Catch-up by Latecomers as an Evolutionary Process. in Richard Nelson (ed.) Modern Evolutionary Economics: An Overview. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108661928
Lin, J. and Chang, H-J. (2009). Should Industrial Policy in Developing Countries Conform to Comparative Advantage or Defy it? A Debate Between Justin Lin and Ha-Joon Chang. Development Policy Review, 27(5), pp. 483-502.    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2009.00456.x
Lin, J. Y. (2012). New Structural Economics: A Framework for Rethinking Development and Policy. Washington, D.C.: World Bank, 1(66393). Pp. 1-388. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/991771468155733696
Lin, J. Y., & Monga, C. (2013). Comparative advantage: The silver bullet of industrial policy. In The industrial policy revolution I, Stiglitz, J. E. & Lin J. Y. , London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Pp. 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137335173_2
Nübler, I., Salazar-Xirinachs, J.M. & Kozul-Wright, R. (2014). Industrial Policy, Productive Transformation and Jobs: Theory, History and Practice. International Labour Organization and United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Geneva.
Ocampo, J.A. (2014). 'Latin American structuralism and production development strategies', in Salazar-Xirinachs, J.M., Nübler, I. and Kozul-Wright, R. (eds.) Transforming economies: Making industrial policy work for growth, jobs and development, Geneva: International Labour Office, pp. 41-63. https://www.ilo.org/media/447421/download
Oqubay, A. & Ohno, K. (eds) (2019). How Nations Learn: Technological Learning, Industrial Policy, and Catch-up. Oxford University Press.   https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/40153
Pack, H. & Saggi, K. (2006). Is there a case for industrial policy? A critical survey. Oxford University Press, 21(2). Pp. 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkl001
Pasinetti, L. (1981). Structural Change and Economic Growth: A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 Peres, W. & Primi, A. (2009). Theory and Practice of Industrial Policy. Evidence from the Latin American Experience. CEPAL - Serie Desarrollo productive, (187), 1-52. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242731366
Pinheiro, M., Ferreira, P., Pessoa, S. & Schymura, L. (2006). Does Brazil Need an Industrial Policy? Fundação Getúlio Vargas. Rio de Janeiro. http://iepecdg.com.br/uploads/artigos/PIingles3[1]-04022007.pdf
Porter, M. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy.  Economic Development Quarterly, 14 (1). Pp. 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105
Rosenberg, N. (1994). Exploring the Black Box: Technology, Economics and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 1-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511582554
Shapiro, H. (2007). Industrial Policy and Growth. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN/DESA), No. 53. Pp. 1-17. http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers
Stiglitz, J. E. & Lin J. Y. (2013). The Industrial Policy Revolution I: The Role of Government Beyond Ideology. International Economic Association Series (IEA), London: Palgrave Macmillan, UK. Pp. 1-408.
Stiglitz, J.E. (2017). Industrial policy, learning, and development', in Page, J. and Tarp, F. (eds.) The practice of industrial policy: Government–Business coordination in Africa and East Asia, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23-39. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198796954.003.0002
The Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). (2020). Maximizing Benefits of Mekong Value Chains for SMEs. United Nations publication. ST/ESCAP/2884. Pp. 1-239. www.uneca.org                                                                               
Thirlwall, A. (2013). Economic Growth in an Open Developing Economy: The Role of Structure and Demand.  Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, pp. 1-200. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:elg:eebook:15208
United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) (2016). Greening Africa’s Industrialization. Economic Report on Africa, No.: E.16.II.K.3, pp. 1-254.
Warwick, K. (2013). Beyond Industrial Policy: Emerging Issues and New Trends. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 2, OECD Publishing, Paris. Pp. 1-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4869clw0xp-en
White, L. J. (2008). Antitrust Policy and Industrial Policy: A View from the US.  NYU Law and Economics, (Available at SSRN Electronic Journal), No. 08-05, pp. 1-18. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1091244  or  http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1091244
Williamson, J. (1993). Democracy and the Washington consensus. World development, 21(8): 1329-1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(93)90046-C
World Bank. (2012). Global Survey of Development Banks.  Research Paper World Bank, Washington, DC: no. 5969. Pp. 1-41.  https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5969
Wylde, C. (2012). Latin America after neoliberalism: Developmental regimes in post-crisis states. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Pp. 1-263.
 Zeng, D.Z. (2011). How do special economic zones and industrial clusters drive China’s rapid development? Washington, D.C.: World Bank. Report Number. No,5583. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1774430